Tuesday, January 6, 2026–9:55 a.m.
-News release-
U.S. Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock (D-GA) joined Senator Ed Markey and five other Senators in urging Laura Swett, Chair of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to take action to ensure that the growth of data centers does not result in unjust or unreasonable increases in energy costs for American households.
“Over the next three years, energy-intensive AI and cryptomining processors could triple their electricity consumption, adding more than 10,000 megawatts of demand annually. In PJM Interconnection, the regional transmission organization (RTO) that serves thirteen states and the District of Columbia in the mid-Atlantic region, data centers will drive 90% of new power demand over the next five years,” said the Senators. “Prompted by projections like these – many of which rely on uncertain and speculative data center proposals – utilities and transmission planning regions are spending billions to guarantee the grid can meet this demand. These costs are then passed to ratepayers through higher monthly bills. American households simply cannot afford inaction from FERC.”
Senator Warnock is laser-focused on making life more affordable for Georgians. That’s why he fought against the Republican One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which rolled back financial incentives that spurred 51 new domestic energy projects in Georgia. That GOP legislation is expected to increase electricity spending by up to $110 per year.
The full letter can be found below and HERE.
Dear Chairman Swett,
Artificial intelligence (AI) and cryptomining are fueling a rising demand for energy driven by massive, power-hungry data centers. The resulting surge in electricity use is contributing to skyrocketing residential electric bills. We write to urge the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to take immediate action to ensure that U.S. households are not forced to bear the costs of the growing nationwide demand for energy by data centers.
These are not merely hypothetical future electricity price hikes, even if some of the data centers themselves are hypothetical at this point. PJM’s 2024 capacity market auction, which aims to secure resources to guarantee that the grid will be able to meet peak demand in the coming months, closed at a record high of $16.6 billion, up from just $2.2 billion in 2023. These costs are being paid by PJM’s 65 million ratepayers. In West Virginia, just two transmission lines proposed in response to forecasted data center energy demand growth are expected to increase residents’ electricity bills by $440 million. These prices hikes are not just limited to PJM – costs are going up in nearly every state. Thus far in 2025, at least 210 utilities have either already raised or proposed to raise electric bills by more than $71 billion for 65 million electric customers. Without reforms, continued data center expansion will exacerbate this trend.
Over the next three years, energy-intensive AI and cryptomining processors could triple their electricity consumption, adding more than 10,000 megawatts of demand annually. In PJM Interconnection, the regional transmission organization (RTO) that serves thirteen states and the District of Columbia in the mid-Atlantic region, data centers will drive 90% of new power demand over the next five years. Prompted by projections like these – many of which rely on uncertain and speculative data center proposals – utilities and transmission planning regions are spending billions to guarantee the grid can meet this demand. These costs are then passed to ratepayers through higher monthly bills.
American households simply cannot afford inaction from FERC. Under the Federal Power Act, FERC is obligated to ensure that utilities and transmission planning regions maintain just and reasonable rates that are neither discriminatory nor preferential. In order to protect ratepayers from unreasonable or unjust price hikes driven by data center energy demand, FERC should reject transmission-related filings that do not properly address cost allocation or allow the cost of transmission built to serve data centers to be spread across the region—such as when FERC reviews Order 1920 compliance filings.
Beyond addressing proposals as they are presented to FERC, the Commission must proactively investigate and act if it finds the practices of a regional operator or utility to be unjust, unreasonable, unduly discriminatory, or preferential to data centers at the expense of residential ratepayers. In February 2025, FERC used its authority to open an investigation into the rules for PJM’s transmission system, aiming to address the build-out of data centers that are tied directly to large-scale generators. This is an important start to address the crisis at hand. FERC can and should investigate existing methods for cost allocation to determine how much residential ratepayers are paying for transmission and, if necessary, require subsequent action to ensure data center owners and operators do not burden households with more than their fair share of power infrastructure costs.
Nor should FERC fall for the argument that data center demand projections must allow large generators to jump the queue for interconnection to the nation’s energy grid. Near-term capacity shortfalls are better met by faster-to-deploy renewable technologies and battery storage than by large and expensive generators that take years to build and get online. Bad interconnection queue proposals will only increase costs to ratepayers without addressing any immediate energy supply issues, as Commissioner Judy Chang rightly noted in her February dissent to FERC’s ruling on PJM’s interconnection proposal to fast-track fossil power plant resources.
FERC should also consider broader proceedings that would standardize load forecasting and other practices relevant to addressing data center demand growth. We appreciate the Commission’s recent call to the RTOs and independent system operators (ISOs) to provide thoughts on how to improve load forecasting. Without transparency into load forecasting, it is difficult to assess the quality of a utility’s load projections, making it challenging to ensure the economically responsible build-out of new generation or transmission assets. With a guaranteed rate of return of around 11%, there is an obvious incentive for utilities to push for huge investments in transmission, including transmission for speculative data center interconnection requests that may not materialize. This means that FERC has an outsized role to play in protecting ratepayer interests and ensuring utility investments are both necessary and well-designed for the grid.
Finally, as FERC considers Energy Secretary Chris Wright’s recent request for a rulemaking to standardize and accelerate the interconnection of large loads like data centers, [I/we] urge FERC to prioritize the concerns of residential ratepayers. FERC is moving quickly on this request – just a few days after receiving the letter from Wright, FERC established a new docket to consider the proposed Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANOPR) and issued a notice inviting comments. The outcomes of this Administration-directed ANOPR could significantly change the degree to which households are charged for connecting big electricity users to the grid.
With energy bills already skyrocketing, FERC must use its authorities to reject unfair grid operator proposals, proactively investigate and address bad utility company practices and ensure just and reasonable rates for all Americans. We urge you to protect residential ratepayers over corporate profits, as FERC’s mission demands.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Comments